<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading the tea leaves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/01/18/reading-the-tea-leaves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/01/18/reading-the-tea-leaves/</link>
	<description>Politics, the environment, technology, activism. And stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crooked Number &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Convio Acquires GetActive (!)</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/01/18/reading-the-tea-leaves/comment-page-1/#comment-186498</link>
		<dc:creator>Crooked Number &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Convio Acquires GetActive (!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/01/18/reading-the-tea-leaves/#comment-186498</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] From NetSquared: This is big news and it bounced around the nonprofit and progressive blogoshere, clogged up the NpTech feed, and flooded listservs. (Just take a look here)Â  Laura Quinn summarizes some of the concerns, while others look at the implications (here, here, here, and here) Will this merger encourage more healthy competition from the other vendors and providers? Or will Convio innovate less due to their massive new market share nd potential perceived lack of competition?Â  Jon Stahl gives us a good reading of the Tea Leaves. &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From NetSquared: This is big news and it bounced around the nonprofit and progressive blogoshere, clogged up the NpTech feed, and flooded listservs. (Just take a look here)Â  Laura Quinn summarizes some of the concerns, while others look at the implications (here, here, here, and here) Will this merger encourage more healthy competition from the other vendors and providers? Or will Convio innovate less due to their massive new market share nd potential perceived lack of competition?Â  Jon Stahl gives us a good reading of the Tea Leaves. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/01/18/reading-the-tea-leaves/comment-page-1/#comment-185862</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/01/18/reading-the-tea-leaves/#comment-185862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well written!!! Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written!!! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/01/18/reading-the-tea-leaves/comment-page-1/#comment-185783</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/01/18/reading-the-tea-leaves/#comment-185783</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely! Monolithic, full-stack solutions like that are so very Web 1.0. I reckon it was quite visionary of ONE/NW to decide on integration instead of development back in, what was it, 2002? That was soooo Web 2.0 of you :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely! Monolithic, full-stack solutions like that are so very Web 1.0. I reckon it was quite visionary of ONE/NW to decide on integration instead of development back in, what was it, 2002? That was soooo Web 2.0 of you <img src='http://jstahl.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

