<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you over-concerned with &#8220;shiny&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/04/30/are-you-over-concerned-with-shiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/04/30/are-you-over-concerned-with-shiny/</link>
	<description>Politics, the environment, technology, activism. And stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:49:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jodie</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/04/30/are-you-over-concerned-with-shiny/comment-page-1/#comment-278839</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/04/30/are-you-over-concerned-with-shiny/#comment-278839</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;musing... Sometimes I worry I am too focused on the prize.... My one track mind... Can leave me frustrated with the randomness of 2.0 apps... Meaning... I want to see how the action I am asking someone to take online or offline translates into deepening our relationship... moving us toward a point of shared mission... rather than seemingly disconnected transactional actions that don&#039;t appear to move the dial. What strategy is this activity connected to? That&#039;s how my brain works... from that foundation is where I can then move to shiny... with our strategy in mind... what fun can we have... where can shiny serve?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>musing&#8230; Sometimes I worry I am too focused on the prize&#8230;. My one track mind&#8230; Can leave me frustrated with the randomness of 2.0 apps&#8230; Meaning&#8230; I want to see how the action I am asking someone to take online or offline translates into deepening our relationship&#8230; moving us toward a point of shared mission&#8230; rather than seemingly disconnected transactional actions that don&#8217;t appear to move the dial. What strategy is this activity connected to? That&#8217;s how my brain works&#8230; from that foundation is where I can then move to shiny&#8230; with our strategy in mind&#8230; what fun can we have&#8230; where can shiny serve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen and the art of Nonprofit Technology</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/04/30/are-you-over-concerned-with-shiny/comment-page-1/#comment-278820</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen and the art of Nonprofit Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 18:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/04/30/are-you-over-concerned-with-shiny/#comment-278820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Too much &quot;shiny&quot;?...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jon Stahl quotes a comment by Ethan Zuckerman about &quot;shiny&quot; - the over attention to cool and groovy web 2.0 functionality. The punch line: ... thereâ€™s a good chance that underneath the shiny is something that isnâ€™t very interesting. (Not...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Too much &#8220;shiny&#8221;?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Jon Stahl quotes a comment by Ethan Zuckerman about &#8220;shiny&#8221; &#8211; the over attention to cool and groovy web 2.0 functionality. The punch line: &#8230; thereâ€™s a good chance that underneath the shiny is something that isnâ€™t very interesting. (Not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
