<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear TechSoup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/</link>
	<description>Politics, the environment, technology, activism. And stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Kanter</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/comment-page-1/#comment-391497</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Kanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/#comment-391497</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;According to a recent email that just went out, TechSoup was part of that group - there were like 62 additional groups that were discovered later on and notified.   That is depressing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a recent email that just went out, TechSoup was part of that group &#8211; there were like 62 additional groups that were discovered later on and notified.   That is depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stahl</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/comment-page-1/#comment-391475</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/#comment-391475</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification, Ted.  Wow, that is depressing.  Glad it wasn&#039;t TechSoup&#039;s fault.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Ted.  Wow, that is depressing.  Glad it wasn&#8217;t TechSoup&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Fickes</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/comment-page-1/#comment-391474</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Fickes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/#comment-391474</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For what it is worth, dozens of GetActive clients that were originally told they were not affected by the hack were informed late the week before Turkey Day that they were indeed victimized. It would appear that Convio brought in external auditors that identified these additional groups. I can&#039;t say that TechSoup was part of this group but a certain organization with which I&#039;m associated fell into that group. All these groups didn&#039;t wait a month - and I seriously doubt that TechSoup waited that long.  We were simply enjoying the (ahem...cough cough) pleasures of working with proprietary software.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it is worth, dozens of GetActive clients that were originally told they were not affected by the hack were informed late the week before Turkey Day that they were indeed victimized. It would appear that Convio brought in external auditors that identified these additional groups. I can&#8217;t say that TechSoup was part of this group but a certain organization with which I&#8217;m associated fell into that group. All these groups didn&#8217;t wait a month &#8211; and I seriously doubt that TechSoup waited that long.  We were simply enjoying the (ahem&#8230;cough cough) pleasures of working with proprietary software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodie</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/comment-page-1/#comment-391456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/#comment-391456</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;pathetic!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pathetic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Benamer</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/comment-page-1/#comment-391449</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Benamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/archives/2007/11/21/dear-techsoup/#comment-391449</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;GAH!!!! That&#039;s my new word when ARRGHH! doesn&#039;t cut it any more.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GAH!!!! That&#8217;s my new word when ARRGHH! doesn&#8217;t cut it any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

