<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATImageEditor: Image editing for Plone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/</link>
	<description>Politics, the environment, technology, activism. And stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stahl</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-395580</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1546#comment-395580</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Andi-
Awesome, can&#039;t wait to check it out!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andi-<br />
Awesome, can&#8217;t wait to check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Zeidler</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-395573</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Zeidler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1546#comment-395573</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;fyi, the &quot;jarn-imagewidget-integration&quot; nicely (well, imho :)) integrates the image editor with archetypes&#039; image widget and is also known to work with the latest &lt;code&gt;plone.app.blob&lt;/code&gt; release...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fyi, the &#8220;jarn-imagewidget-integration&#8221; nicely (well, imho <img src='http://jstahl.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) integrates the image editor with archetypes&#8217; image widget and is also known to work with the latest <code>plone.app.blob</code> release&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-393178</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1546#comment-393178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice review.. and good to know. It&#039;s a very impressive tool  and I think if you want to have Plone more accessible to a wider audience it will need a lot more of these type of applications.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;About your comment that Plone is a CMS not an image editing tool: you&#039;re missing the point. Or it is the point of view of a coder. The point from a user is that things have to be intuitive, or similar to what is common on other platforms you go to, or what makes sense to them, or what is logical to them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All too often have we heard that argument as an explanation why something is not possible, never the other way around. As a user I find such an argument unimpressive, merely hiding behind a narrow definition and certainly not a positive contribution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tools like these show how the whole CMS argument can be proven wrong (and I am sorry but is doing some basic stuff to an image not &quot;managing content&quot; as well ??) and are, indeed impressive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review.. and good to know. It&#8217;s a very impressive tool  and I think if you want to have Plone more accessible to a wider audience it will need a lot more of these type of applications.</p>
<p>About your comment that Plone is a CMS not an image editing tool: you&#8217;re missing the point. Or it is the point of view of a coder. The point from a user is that things have to be intuitive, or similar to what is common on other platforms you go to, or what makes sense to them, or what is logical to them.</p>
<p>All too often have we heard that argument as an explanation why something is not possible, never the other way around. As a user I find such an argument unimpressive, merely hiding behind a narrow definition and certainly not a positive contribution.</p>
<p>Tools like these show how the whole CMS argument can be proven wrong (and I am sorry but is doing some basic stuff to an image not &#8220;managing content&#8221; as well ??) and are, indeed impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stahl&#8217;s Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ATImageEditor: evolving quickly!</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-393136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stahl&#8217;s Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ATImageEditor: evolving quickly!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1546#comment-393136</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] ATImageEditor, an image editor for Plone, is coming along nicely. Since I first wrote a gushy love note to it a couple weeks ago, Nathan&#8217;s been hard at work improving it with: Control over JPEG [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ATImageEditor, an image editor for Plone, is coming along nicely. Since I first wrote a gushy love note to it a couple weeks ago, Nathan&#8217;s been hard at work improving it with: Control over JPEG [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stahl</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-393117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1546#comment-393117</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nathan-&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Aha, that makes a lot of sense, it&#039;s a very useful feature.
Maybe implement as a button labelled &quot;resize image to current zoom&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan-</p>
<p>Aha, that makes a lot of sense, it&#8217;s a very useful feature.<br />
Maybe implement as a button labelled &#8220;resize image to current zoom&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Van Gheem</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-393116</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Van Gheem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1546#comment-393116</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I appreciate the comments and suggestions.  They will be a huge asset for future development of the product.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One nagging concern is the &quot;use zoom apparent&quot; checkbox.  I have heard from multiple people that this is confusing and I am unsure on how I should word it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This feature applies the current zoom setting to the crop and resize so you essentially get an image that is the exact size you see on your screen.  The reason I added this was because with massive images(2k x 2k range), it would take multiple clicks to get the size I wanted.  By just using the zoom size that I saw on the screen, you&#039;re able to get the exact size you want faster and more accurately.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any comments on a better way of implementing it or wording the checkbox would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks,
Nathan&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the comments and suggestions.  They will be a huge asset for future development of the product.</p>
<p>One nagging concern is the &#8220;use zoom apparent&#8221; checkbox.  I have heard from multiple people that this is confusing and I am unsure on how I should word it.</p>
<p>This feature applies the current zoom setting to the crop and resize so you essentially get an image that is the exact size you see on your screen.  The reason I added this was because with massive images(2k x 2k range), it would take multiple clicks to get the size I wanted.  By just using the zoom size that I saw on the screen, you&#8217;re able to get the exact size you want faster and more accurately.</p>
<p>Any comments on a better way of implementing it or wording the checkbox would be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Nathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davi Lima</title>
		<link>http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/08/03/atimageeditor-image-editing-for-plone/comment-page-1/#comment-393069</link>
		<dc:creator>Davi Lima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1546#comment-393069</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LetÂ´s put PIL to work in Plone! IÂ´m willing to help Nathan implemeting this set of features. Would you like to help us? Make contact! :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LetÂ´s put PIL to work in Plone! IÂ´m willing to help Nathan implemeting this set of features. Would you like to help us? Make contact! <img src='http://jstahl.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

