Comments on: Running Plone trunk under Python 2.6 on Mac OS X http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/12/12/running-plone-trunk-under-python-26-on-mac-os-x/ Politics, the environment, technology, activism. And stuff. Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:35:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Jon Stahl's Journal » Blog Archive » Plone 4: uses 29% less memory than Plone 3 (thanks, Python 2.6!) http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/12/12/running-plone-trunk-under-python-26-on-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-394940 Jon Stahl's Journal » Blog Archive » Plone 4: uses 29% less memory than Plone 3 (thanks, Python 2.6!) Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:12:18 +0000 http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1634#comment-394940 <p>[...] Continuing on the theme of quick-and-dirty benchmarking of the forthcoming Plone 4 release, I decided to revisit an experiment I did about a year ago in which I looked at the memory usage on startup of Plone 3 vs. Plone 4.  In December 2008, I found that Plone trunk used 36% less memory on startup than Plone 3.1.7. [...]</p> [...] Continuing on the theme of quick-and-dirty benchmarking of the forthcoming Plone 4 release, I decided to revisit an experiment I did about a year ago in which I looked at the memory usage on startup of Plone 3 vs. Plone 4.  In December 2008, I found that Plone trunk used 36% less memory on startup than Plone 3.1.7. [...]

]]> By: Alexander Limi http://jstahl.org/archives/2008/12/12/running-plone-trunk-under-python-26-on-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-393514 Alexander Limi Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:47:43 +0000 http://blogs.onenw.org/jon/?p=1634#comment-393514 <p>Yes, you do indeed need to run the "sudo ports install py26-pil" step twice, it fails the first time.</p> <p>And again, a reminder: this is only if you want to have a look at what current development looks like, do <em>not</em> use this for any real web site.</p> Yes, you do indeed need to run the “sudo ports install py26-pil” step twice, it fails the first time.

And again, a reminder: this is only if you want to have a look at what current development looks like, do not use this for any real web site.

]]>